What will be the future of the US economy under the leadership of Kamala Harris?

What will be the future of the US economy under the leadership of Kamala Harris
Credit: Getty Images

Recently the debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump was held. In this argument, Kamala Harris outshone the former president Donald Trump. She made arguments with Trump on many important topics. It includes reproductive rights, support for small businesses, immigration, and foreign policy. Her opinion matched with the viewpoints of many Americans. However, one major topic didn’t get enough attention: the upcoming election will decide if the United States will continue to lead in the future economy.

The person who wins this election will determine if the US stays at the forefront of innovation or not. The changing climate also badly impacts the global markets. This change provided the United States with two important choices. One is that the US leads in developing clean technologies and provides opportunities along with profits. Or let this nation step back and other countries take this lead. 

Many experts say that Kamala’s plans are good for the US future because in this way America keeps growing and leading in technology. Furthermore, the strategies proposed by Harris are better for American families as compared to Trump’s plan. Donald Trump proposal looks like to return to old economic models. It only benefits a few powerful allies but is not good for the middle class. 

For jobs and businesses, focusing on new ideas and innovation is crucial for maintaining US leadership in the world.

To boost the clean energy and economy, Vice President Kamala Harris has played a major role. She was the one who stood in favour of passing the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). In the history of the United States, this is the largest clean energy investment. To support climate solutions, the Inflation Reduction Act allocated nearly $346 billion. This huge investment became the source of creating 330,000 jobs almost in every state. It has also helped lower energy costs for households and increased the growth of the manufacturing industry.

On the other hand, the view of Donald Trump on climate innovation is not as good as Kamala Harri’s. His comments about windmills and polar bears may sound amusing, but they reveal how little he values the progress needed to tackle climate change. He did not discuss this translation, even though it could hurt the United States economy in the long run. 

If Trump were to reverse these policies, it would undermine America’s ability to lead the global clean energy market.

The world is moving toward clean energy with or without US leadership. However, without key policies in place, America risks losing its competitive edge in a market worth $650 billion by 2030.

What is Trump’s plan for the US economy?

Trump’s plan looks like it threatens the progress that the US has made in clean energy and technology. In this debate, he talks too much about China. His approach could help China take the lead in the next big technological change. China is a nation that also makes more progress in clean energy than any other nation. China has increased its solar energy production by 35 times and wind energy by 9 times in just the last ten years. If the US does not take any steps then China will lead the race for clean energy jobs, mineral supply chains, and solar manufacturing.

This is not just about clean energy, it’s also about artificial intelligence (AI). AI needs a huge amount of energy, and if we continue to rely on fossil fuels, it could have a disastrous effect on the environment. To stay ahead in AI, the US must build more renewable energy sources to power AI technologies. China is already investing in the clean energy needed for its own AI systems.

To fulfill the world’s requirements, the United States needs a leader who knows these challenges. Also, the person should know how to benefit from the opportunities of both clean energy and AI. 

The stakes are high, and the choices made now will shape the future of the US economy and its ability to lead in the innovation space.

Hopefully, this debate will make clear to the American voters that who is best for the US future and economy. 

On one side there is a candidate whose history is not good. His past presidency period raises questions about his ability. Will he manage the country’s finances in a good way? In contrast, the other candidate Kamala Harris presented herself as a leader dedicated to fostering a competitive and innovative economy. Her main objective is to introduce the path that directly relates to long-term prosperity. 

Author

Sign up for our Newsletter

Click edit button to change this text. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit