On Wednesday, February 26, 2025, NYCFPA held a compelling panel discussion at the National Press Club, focusing on the significant impact of recent U.S. administrations on reproductive rights and healthcare access for women, particularly marginalized populations. Moderated by Anna Albuquerque, the panel of speakers included Sofia Resnick from States Newsroom, Jessica Waters from American University, and Nina Besser Doorley from the Institute for Women’s Policy Research.

The speakers outlined the urgent consequences of halted research and restrictive reproductive laws, emphasizing how these policies have led to a detrimental landscape for healthcare, education, and mental health. Highlighting the nefarious effects of the Trump administration’s policies, the panel noted a marked increase in maternal mortality rates and economic implications among marginalized communities, alongside the criminalization faced by women seeking reproductive healthcare. The panel delved deeper into the implications of the Global Gag Rule, a policy that has restricted NGOs from obtaining U.S. funding if they provide or refer abortion services. This policy has perpetuated unsafe abortion practices and access restrictions to contraception globally, leading to clinic closures and diminished health service availability. The panelists stressed that the current state of U.S. foreign assistance, compounded by staffing cuts at USAID, could lead to severe health crises, further endangering women’s lives. Addressing the recent developments concerning Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives in higher education, the panel discussed the chilling effects of potential federal investigations on institutions that promote DEI efforts. This development poses a significant threat that discourages private companies, schools, and other entities from advancing inclusive policies, showing the necessity for resilience in activism amid a turbulent political landscape.
The discussion also touched on the emergence of “shield laws” meant to protect abortion providers from legal repercussions, thus highlighting the importance of safeguarding reproductive healthcare in the face of legal challenges. The interconnectedness of various social justice issues was emphasized, with a call for narratives that resonate personally to galvanize understanding and advocacy.
Additionally, the panel underscored the challenges of navigating a confusing media landscape, where misinformation often prevails. With local and state news emerging as potentially more effective channels for reaching communities, activist organizations are stepping up to provide vital resources and support, particularly concerning abortion rights and mental health. The conversations extended to the changing dynamics of employment for women, noting the precarious balance between public service ideals and financial stability in the private sector.
The panel concluded with a robust discussion on the anti-abortion movement’s influence over reproductive health narratives and a call for continued vigilance in disseminating accurate information amid significant societal challenges. Overall, the event served as a crucial reminder of the resilience needed in activism and the ongoing struggle for women’s rights, emphasizing collective action and the pivotal role of independent media in shaping the conversation around reproductive healthcare and rights.

